logo English | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | 한국어 | 日本 | India
        

首页 > Ei Compendex 内容要求和选择标准

 

Ei Compendex 内容要求和选择标准

点击查看EI最新刊源信息公布(包含收录原则等重要信息)

Compendex 是一个包罗万象的工程文献数据库,涵盖当今最全面的工程研究文献。它不断更新,及时为工程界进行研究和发现提供相关资源。

每隔一段时间,Compendex 工程数据库会纳入新的工程出版物,并可能会剔除一些目前包括的工程出版物。而这些决定则会咨询第三方独立评审,他们会依据自己的专业知识和背景给出意见。

入选的出版物中的文章大多主要针对核心工程科目,但是我们偶尔也会考虑其他工程相关科目或工程边缘科目。如果这类出版物入选,则是因为第一其中工程相关内容的质量很高,第二其文章内容对Compendex 在其索引范围内某专业领域的覆盖度贡献很大。

期刊出版物评选标准
根据以下最低要求来初步筛选期刊出版物:

注册并有效的ISSN
同行评审
英文摘要
定期出版
已出版至少2年
稳定的论文发表量

出版伦理声明 (COPE)

出版伦理资源包 (PERK)

数字资源长期保存政策 (PORTICO)

CLOCKSS存档

通过初步筛选的期刊出版物会进一步按照定性/定量评选标准进行评审:

  期刊方针   内容质量   期刊地位   规律性   在线可用性
有说服力的编辑理念 对相关领域的学术贡献 期刊论文的引用率,包括自引率 出版无延迟或中断 内容在线可访问
同行评审类型  摘要的清晰度  对于中国本土期刊, 参考ISTIC及其他国内排名 每卷/期出版频率和论文发表量稳定、可预测  数字化政策以及长期保存措施
编辑的多样性和地域广泛性  与所述宗旨的相符性及质量     英文版期刊主页
作者的多样性和地域广泛性 论文的可读性

 

    主页质量
 

Roman字体的参考文献

   

数位物件识别号

会议论文集评选标准
根据以下最低要求来初步筛选会议论文集:

 

注册并有效的ISSN/ISBN

 

同行评审

 

具有英语摘要的全文论文

 

内容在线可访问

 

出版伦理声明

通过初步筛选的会议论文集会进一步按照定性/定量评选标准进行评审:

 会议方针 会议组织 内容质量 会议地位 在线可用性
有说服力且有重点的宗旨范围 公开合作者/赞助商 题目/摘要的专业、科学、写作质量 组委会和专家委员会的声誉/地位 英文版会议主页
透明的同行评审政策 透明的作者指南和说明 对相关领域的学术贡献  会议是否被列入权威列表 主页质量
组委会和专家委员会的地域多样性和广泛性 透明的费用结构

论文的可读性

  数位物件识别号 
作者的地域多样性和广泛性  

 

 与所述宗旨的相符性以及质量  

 

    论文的原创性/真实性      
    Roman字体的参考文献    

即使评估审查的出版物满足上述所以标准,也不一定能最终入选,因为可能还有一些其他因素会计入考量。

工程出版物及内容:成功入选的要求清单

工程出版物和内容应满足以下标准:
1 期刊必须有ISSN 国际中心登记的国际标准期刊编号(ISSN)。
2 工程出版物中所有的工程研究文章必须有英文标题及英文摘要,但文章全文的语言不限。
    a) 需提供信息详实而非只是表述性的摘要
    b) 摘要经评估确认清晰明了
3 出版物至少已发行两年,并已证实按时定期出版,至少每年一期(会议记录或不常发表的专题系列除外)。
4 出版物必须包括经同行评审的工程内容,并具有公开的同行评审过程描述。行业刊物和一些会议记录除外。
5 出版物必须具有权威性,通常取决于其发行机构(商业或社会发行机构)的信誉。
6 出版物的办刊方针必须具有说服力,并符合规定的目标和出版范围。
7 出版物必须包括针对国际读者的相关工程内容,例如,必须有英文摘要和英文出版物,并用拉丁字母标明参考文献。
8 综合质量高,对出版物的质量评估包括但不限于:
9 在不考虑预期目的和受众情况的情况下,文章对行业的学术贡献。其内容和科学价值(有效性、重要性、原创性和单个工程出版物的整体内容行业覆盖度)是推荐出版物编入索引的关键因素。是向全球科学界展示重要原创研究的文章。
10 作者和编辑的国际化和地域广泛性。
11 工程出版物必须有公开的出版伦理规范和出版事故声明,遵守出版伦理规范。
12 出版物必须有公开的符合数字化长期保存措施的方针。
13 出版物的外观,即,打印/纸质/电子/网站等,必须是优质、清晰及易于访问的:
    a) 全文或目录必须可在线获取,拥有优质的英语主页
    b) 文章和论文摘要必须清晰易懂

! 如果工程出版物主要内容来自转载的文章、协会活动的报告、工程文献摘要、新闻或书评,那么通常不予考虑入选。

此网页英文本与其中文译文本之间有任何冲突、不一致、歧义、分歧,英文版本为准。英文版如下:

Ei Compendex Content Policy and Selection

Compendex is an all-encompassing engineering literature database comprising the most comprehensive engineering literature research in the world. It is continually updated, providing the engineering community with a timely and relevant resource for engineering research and discovery.

Periodically, new engineering publications are identified and selected for inclusion in the Compendex engineering database, while other currently covered engineering publications may be discontinued. Selections for new publications and content are made, in part, with the advice of external, independent reviewers, based on their professional expertise and background.

Engineering publications that are selected contain articles predominantly on core engineering subjects. Publications whose content is peripheral, or related, to engineering are occasionally evaluated, taking into consideration both the quality of the publication's engineering content, and the contribution its content makes to overall coverage of its particular subject in Compendex.

Initial eligibility of publications will be evaluated on adherence to the following minimum criteria:

Valid, Registered ISSN Peer-review English Abstracts Regular Publication
Two-year Publication History
Regular Publishing Output
Publication Ethics Statement (COPE)

Publishing Ethics Resource Kit (PERK)

Digital Preservation Policy (PORTICO)

The CLOCKSS Archive

Eligible titles are reviewed according to a combination of quantitative and qualitative selection criteria:

Journal Policy Quality of Content Journal Standing Regularity Online Availability
Convincing editorial concept/policy Academic contribution to the field Citedness of journal articles, including self-citation rate No delay or interruption in publication schedules Content available online
Type of peer-review Clarity of abstracts For local Chinese journals, ISTIC & other national rankings are consulted Volume/issue frequency and article output should be reliable and predictable Digital policies and preservation practices
Diversity and geographic distribution of editors Quality and conformity with stated aims & scope     English-language journal home page
Diversity & geographic distribution of authors Readability of articles     Quality of home page
   

Roman references

     

Digital object Identifier

Conference Proceeding Selection Criteria
Initial eligibility of conference proceedings will be evaluated on adherence to the following minimum criteria:

Valid, Registered ISSN/ISBN Peer-review Full-text Papers with English Abstracts

Content Accessible Online

Publication Ethics Statement

 Eligible titles are reviewed according to a combination of quantitative and qualitative selection criteria:

Conference Policy Conference Organization Quality of Content Conference Standing Online Availability 
Convincing and focused scope Disclosure of partners/sponsors Technical, scientific, and written quality of titles/abstracts Reputation/standing of the technical and program committees English-language conference home page
Transparent

peer-review policy

Transparent guidelines and instructions for authors Academic contribution

to the field

Conference included in authoritative list Quality of home page
Geographic diversity and distribution of technical and program committees Transparent fee structure Readability of articles     Digital object Identifier
Geographic diversity and  distribution of authors   Quality and conformity with stated aims & scope    Quality of home page
    Originality/authenticity

of papers

  Digital object Identifier
    Roman references    

There is no guarantee that publications evaluated, reviewed, or meeting all of the criteria above will ultimately be selected for coverage, as other extenuating or internal factors may prevail.

Engineering Publications & Content: A Checklist for Successful Inclusion

Engineering publications and content should meet the following criteria:
1 Journals must have an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) as registered with the ISSN International Centre。
2 Engineering publications must have an English-language title and publish English-language abstracts for all engineering research articles. However, full-text articles can be in any language.
    a) Informative, rather than indicative abstracts are preferred.
    b) The clarity of abstracts is evaluated.
3 Publications are suggested to have at least two-year publication history and have demonstrated publish issues in a timely manner and regularly, with a minimum of one issue per year (the exceptions being conference proceedings or monographic series which may be published less frequently).
4 Publications must consist of peer-reviewed engineering content and have a publicly available description of the peer review process. Exceptions would be trade journals and some conference proceedings.
5 Publications must exhibit authority, often represented in the reputation of a commercial or society publisher.
6 Publications must have a convincing editorial policy, with conformity to the stated aims and scope of the publication.
7 Publications must comprise engineering content that is relevant for and readable by an international audience, e.g., they must have English language abstracts and publications, and have references in Roman script.
8 Overall quality must be high. Assessment of a publication's quality may include, but is not limited to, the following:
9 Academic contribution to the field wherein content and scientific merit (validity, importance, originality, and contribution to the coverage of the field in the overall contents of each engineering publication) are key factors considered in recommending a publication for indexing, whatever the intended purpose and audience. Articles represent original research of importance to the global scientific community.
10 International/geographic diversity of authors and editors.
11 Engineering publications must have a publicly available publication ethics and publication malpractice statement and adhere to publication ethics practices.
12 Publications must have a publicly available policy demonstrating adherence to digital preservation practice(s).
13 The appearance of the publication, i.e., print/paper/electronic/website, etc., must be high quality, clear, and accessible:
    a) Either the full text or tables of contents must be available online, with a high quality English-language home page available
    b) Articles and abstracts must be clear and readable

! Engineering publications that consist primarily of content from reprinted articles, reports of association activities, abstracts of engineering literature, news items, or book reviews, will typically not be considered for selection.

 Print